Data Vanguards.
Problem-Framing Field Guide
Your recommended method

Design Thinking

Get human-centred when the problem is still fuzzy.

Why this method

A loop of empathise → define → ideate → prototype → test, for problems where you don't yet understand what fans or members truly need. Clubs often jump to building an app when the real problem is a feeling — friction, exclusion, irrelevance. Design Thinking helps you reframe the problem before you attempt to solve it.

The most important step is the first one: getting into the room with the people who feel the problem. Not in a focus group or a survey — at the actual touchpoint, watching what happens and asking what surprised them. The 'How Might We' that comes out of that is worth more than any solution generated in a meeting room.

Your next move

Run an empathy pass: shadow three to five fans or members at a real touchpoint — matchday, renewal, joining — and capture what genuinely surprises you. Then rewrite the problem as a single “How might we …” statement from their point of view before generating any solutions.

Your template — the How Might We statement

Write this after your empathy pass

How might we [enable or improve something, reframed from what you observed]

for [specific person or segment you shadowed]

so that [the outcome or progress they're trying to reach]?

e.g. "How might we make the renewal experience feel like a reward for loyal supporters, so that renewing feels better than not renewing — rather than just an obligation?"

Three quick-start steps

Turn this into a build plan.

A Data Vanguards diagnostic helps you design the empathy pass, interpret what you find, and turn the insight into the product decision.

Book a diagnostic →
Data Vanguards — strategy, design & engineering for sports organisations. datavanguards.com